User talk:Phaedrus/A Trickster's Tail - Revision history

Phaedrus: Response to WolfyDrake95

2009-08-31T17:38:28Z

Response to WolfyDrake95

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:38, 31 August 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:

	I don't know what to say, but I just want to tell you that I enjoyed this story very much. It's a huge pity that you've stopped writing it; it certainly is a very good story. Oh, and I agree with Lloyd...it's not really ''that'' explicit. Still, once again, great story! :) —[[User:WolfyDrake95\|Drake]] 14:14, 31 August 2009 (UTC)		I don't know what to say, but I just want to tell you that I enjoyed this story very much. It's a huge pity that you've stopped writing it; it certainly is a very good story. Oh, and I agree with Lloyd...it's not really ''that'' explicit. Still, once again, great story! :) —[[User:WolfyDrake95\|Drake]] 14:14, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
			: Thank you so much! I don't know how likely it is that I'll ever do another proper Trickster's Tail segment, but I have to admit, the odds recently rose from 'zero'... there's a storyverse called "Dire Warning" going on right now on the TSA-Talk mailing list, and I've written a few pieces for that. I'm not posting them here because they make no sense outside of the context of Kris Schnee's stories (heck, I'm not sure they make sense ''within'' that context), but Kickaha and Keith do make an appearance... and after ten years, they're understandably a little cranky. [[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 17:38, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

WolfyDrake95: I loved this story!

2009-08-31T14:14:29Z

I loved this story!

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 31 August 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::That makes sense. I guess my definition of adult comes from having to sift through the stuff on CYOC >< --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel\|Lloyd Brunnel]] 13:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)		::That makes sense. I guess my definition of adult comes from having to sift through the stuff on CYOC >< --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel\|Lloyd Brunnel]] 13:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
	:::I've revised the author's note, though, to make this as clear as I can without venturing into spoiler territory. [[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 15:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)		:::I've revised the author's note, though, to make this as clear as I can without venturing into spoiler territory. [[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 15:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

			I don't know what to say, but I just want to tell you that I enjoyed this story very much. It's a huge pity that you've stopped writing it; it certainly is a very good story. Oh, and I agree with Lloyd...it's not really ''that'' explicit. Still, once again, great story! :) —[[User:WolfyDrake95\|Drake]] 14:14, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Phaedrus: Response to Lloyd; tweaking the author's note

2009-08-30T15:50:13Z

Response to Lloyd; tweaking the author's note

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:50, 30 August 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: Thank you so much for the advice (and for listing this story in your favorites -- that's a real honor). I'm not at all sure what to do with this. It seems to me that there are two ways that something can be 'adult'. One way is by being explicit. There's not really any of that in this story -- there's some foul language, but nothing out of the ordinary these days; and there's some sexual content, but it's left to the imagination. But it seems to me that something can also be 'adult' purely on its themes, and I still have the feeling that that's the case here. I mean, it does have sexual intercourse going on ''during'' a transformation (a transformation to full-animal form by both parties, no less), and I think that the mere concept of that would be offensive to a substantial number of people. And I'm inclined to err on the side of caution. So I think I'll leave the 'adult' tag for now. But I'll definitely think it over; when I become more familiar with the site and see how other similar stories are tagged, I might change my mind. --[[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 03:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)		: Thank you so much for the advice (and for listing this story in your favorites -- that's a real honor). I'm not at all sure what to do with this. It seems to me that there are two ways that something can be 'adult'. One way is by being explicit. There's not really any of that in this story -- there's some foul language, but nothing out of the ordinary these days; and there's some sexual content, but it's left to the imagination. But it seems to me that something can also be 'adult' purely on its themes, and I still have the feeling that that's the case here. I mean, it does have sexual intercourse going on ''during'' a transformation (a transformation to full-animal form by both parties, no less), and I think that the mere concept of that would be offensive to a substantial number of people. And I'm inclined to err on the side of caution. So I think I'll leave the 'adult' tag for now. But I'll definitely think it over; when I become more familiar with the site and see how other similar stories are tagged, I might change my mind. --[[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 03:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
	::That makes sense. I guess my definition of adult comes from having to sift through the stuff on CYOC >< --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel\|Lloyd Brunnel]] 13:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)		::That makes sense. I guess my definition of adult comes from having to sift through the stuff on CYOC >< --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel\|Lloyd Brunnel]] 13:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
			:::I've revised the author's note, though, to make this as clear as I can without venturing into spoiler territory. [[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 15:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Lloyd Brunnel: Makes sense

2009-08-30T13:18:26Z

Makes sense

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:18, 30 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I strongly advise that you remove the Adult tag from this story and simply use the author's note as a disclaimer. The "adult" material is minor and I would hate to think someone missed out on your wonderful story because they were turned off by those three red Xes. --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel\|Lloyd Brunnel]] 03:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)		I strongly advise that you remove the Adult tag from this story and simply use the author's note as a disclaimer. The "adult" material is minor and I would hate to think someone missed out on your wonderful story because they were turned off by those three red Xes. --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel\|Lloyd Brunnel]] 03:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
	: Thank you so much for the advice (and for listing this story in your favorites -- that's a real honor). I'm not at all sure what to do with this. It seems to me that there are two ways that something can be 'adult'. One way is by being explicit. There's not really any of that in this story -- there's some foul language, but nothing out of the ordinary these days; and there's some sexual content, but it's left to the imagination. But it seems to me that something can also be 'adult' purely on its themes, and I still have the feeling that that's the case here. I mean, it does have sexual intercourse going on ''during'' a transformation (a transformation to full-animal form by both parties, no less), and I think that the mere concept of that would be offensive to a substantial number of people. And I'm inclined to err on the side of caution. So I think I'll leave the 'adult' tag for now. But I'll definitely think it over; when I become more familiar with the site and see how other similar stories are tagged, I might change my mind. --[[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 03:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)		: Thank you so much for the advice (and for listing this story in your favorites -- that's a real honor). I'm not at all sure what to do with this. It seems to me that there are two ways that something can be 'adult'. One way is by being explicit. There's not really any of that in this story -- there's some foul language, but nothing out of the ordinary these days; and there's some sexual content, but it's left to the imagination. But it seems to me that something can also be 'adult' purely on its themes, and I still have the feeling that that's the case here. I mean, it does have sexual intercourse going on ''during'' a transformation (a transformation to full-animal form by both parties, no less), and I think that the mere concept of that would be offensive to a substantial number of people. And I'm inclined to err on the side of caution. So I think I'll leave the 'adult' tag for now. But I'll definitely think it over; when I become more familiar with the site and see how other similar stories are tagged, I might change my mind. --[[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 03:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
			::That makes sense. I guess my definition of adult comes from having to sift through the stuff on CYOC >< --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel\|Lloyd Brunnel]] 13:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Phaedrus: Response to Lloyd Brunnel's suggestion

2009-08-30T03:40:13Z

Response to Lloyd Brunnel's suggestion

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 29 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I strongly advise that you remove the Adult tag from this story and simply use the author's note as a disclaimer. The "adult" material is minor and I would hate to think someone missed out on your wonderful story because they were turned off by those three red Xes. --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel\|Lloyd Brunnel]] 03:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)		I strongly advise that you remove the Adult tag from this story and simply use the author's note as a disclaimer. The "adult" material is minor and I would hate to think someone missed out on your wonderful story because they were turned off by those three red Xes. --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel\|Lloyd Brunnel]] 03:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
			: Thank you so much for the advice (and for listing this story in your favorites -- that's a real honor). I'm not at all sure what to do with this. It seems to me that there are two ways that something can be 'adult'. One way is by being explicit. There's not really any of that in this story -- there's some foul language, but nothing out of the ordinary these days; and there's some sexual content, but it's left to the imagination. But it seems to me that something can also be 'adult' purely on its themes, and I still have the feeling that that's the case here. I mean, it does have sexual intercourse going on ''during'' a transformation (a transformation to full-animal form by both parties, no less), and I think that the mere concept of that would be offensive to a substantial number of people. And I'm inclined to err on the side of caution. So I think I'll leave the 'adult' tag for now. But I'll definitely think it over; when I become more familiar with the site and see how other similar stories are tagged, I might change my mind. --[[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 03:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Lloyd Brunnel: Created page with 'I strongly advise that you remove the Adult tag from this story and simply use the author's note as a disclaimer. The "adult" material is minor and I would hate to think someone ...'

2009-08-30T03:14:29Z

Created page with 'I strongly advise that you remove the Adult tag from this story and simply use the author's note as a disclaimer. The "adult" material is minor and I would hate to think someone ...'

New page

I strongly advise that you remove the Adult tag from this story and simply use the author's note as a disclaimer. The "adult" material is minor and I would hate to think someone missed out on your wonderful story because they were turned off by those three red Xes. --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel|Lloyd Brunnel]] 03:14, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 31 August 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::That makes sense. I guess my definition of adult comes from having to sift through the stuff on CYOC >< --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel\|Lloyd Brunnel]] 13:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)		::That makes sense. I guess my definition of adult comes from having to sift through the stuff on CYOC >< --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel\|Lloyd Brunnel]] 13:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
	:::I've revised the author's note, though, to make this as clear as I can without venturing into spoiler territory. [[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 15:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)		:::I've revised the author's note, though, to make this as clear as I can without venturing into spoiler territory. [[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 15:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

			I don't know what to say, but I just want to tell you that I enjoyed this story very much. It's a huge pity that you've stopped writing it; it certainly is a very good story. Oh, and I agree with Lloyd...it's not really ''that'' explicit. Still, once again, great story! :) —[[User:WolfyDrake95\|Drake]] 14:14, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:50, 30 August 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	: Thank you so much for the advice (and for listing this story in your favorites -- that's a real honor). I'm not at all sure what to do with this. It seems to me that there are two ways that something can be 'adult'. One way is by being explicit. There's not really any of that in this story -- there's some foul language, but nothing out of the ordinary these days; and there's some sexual content, but it's left to the imagination. But it seems to me that something can also be 'adult' purely on its themes, and I still have the feeling that that's the case here. I mean, it does have sexual intercourse going on ''during'' a transformation (a transformation to full-animal form by both parties, no less), and I think that the mere concept of that would be offensive to a substantial number of people. And I'm inclined to err on the side of caution. So I think I'll leave the 'adult' tag for now. But I'll definitely think it over; when I become more familiar with the site and see how other similar stories are tagged, I might change my mind. --[[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 03:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)		: Thank you so much for the advice (and for listing this story in your favorites -- that's a real honor). I'm not at all sure what to do with this. It seems to me that there are two ways that something can be 'adult'. One way is by being explicit. There's not really any of that in this story -- there's some foul language, but nothing out of the ordinary these days; and there's some sexual content, but it's left to the imagination. But it seems to me that something can also be 'adult' purely on its themes, and I still have the feeling that that's the case here. I mean, it does have sexual intercourse going on ''during'' a transformation (a transformation to full-animal form by both parties, no less), and I think that the mere concept of that would be offensive to a substantial number of people. And I'm inclined to err on the side of caution. So I think I'll leave the 'adult' tag for now. But I'll definitely think it over; when I become more familiar with the site and see how other similar stories are tagged, I might change my mind. --[[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 03:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
	::That makes sense. I guess my definition of adult comes from having to sift through the stuff on CYOC >< --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel\|Lloyd Brunnel]] 13:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)		::That makes sense. I guess my definition of adult comes from having to sift through the stuff on CYOC >< --[[User:Lloyd Brunnel\|Lloyd Brunnel]] 13:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
			:::I've revised the author's note, though, to make this as clear as I can without venturing into spoiler territory. [[User:Phaedrus\|Phaedrus]] 15:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)