User talk:Vitruvian Being - Revision history

Bryan: Some ideas on how to raise issues like this

2011-02-21T15:15:27Z

Some ideas on how to raise issues like this

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:15, 21 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Please do not make such notes on Category pages - they do not belong there. Technically correct though it may be, Lycanthropy has been, in a sense, co-opted to mean any form of a "were" disease or disorder. What that means is that your objection has been noted, but will not be acted upon. Thank you. -- [[User:ShadowWolf\|ShadowWolf]] 12:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)		Please do not make such notes on Category pages - they do not belong there. Technically correct though it may be, Lycanthropy has been, in a sense, co-opted to mean any form of a "were" disease or disorder. What that means is that your objection has been noted, but will not be acted upon. Thank you. -- [[User:ShadowWolf\|ShadowWolf]] 12:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

	It's better to receive a response rather than Wikipedia's lifeless bots.		It's better to receive a response rather than Wikipedia's lifeless bots. -- Vitruvian Being

			:Wikipedia's bots have feelings too, they're that sophisticated. :) Anyway, if you do wish to raise an issue with the categorization of a page, probably the best place to put the comment is either on the story's talk page or the category's talk page. If the comment receives no reply after a while, going to the author's talk page or an admin's talk page to raise awareness might also be a good approach. [[User:Bryan\|Bryan]] 15:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Vitruvian Being at 12:42, 21 February 2011

2011-02-21T12:42:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 21 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Please do not make such notes on Category pages - they do not belong there. Technically correct though it may be, Lycanthropy has been, in a sense, co-opted to mean any form of a "were" disease or disorder. What that means is that your objection has been noted, but will not be acted upon. Thank you. -- [[User:ShadowWolf\|ShadowWolf]] 12:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)		Please do not make such notes on Category pages - they do not belong there. Technically correct though it may be, Lycanthropy has been, in a sense, co-opted to mean any form of a "were" disease or disorder. What that means is that your objection has been noted, but will not be acted upon. Thank you. -- [[User:ShadowWolf\|ShadowWolf]] 12:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

			It's better to receive a response rather than Wikipedia's lifeless bots.

ShadowWolf: Created page with 'Please do not make such notes on Category pages - they do not belong there. Technically correct though it may be, Lycanthropy has been, in a sense, co-opted to mean any form of a…'

2011-02-21T12:40:48Z

Created page with 'Please do not make such notes on Category pages - they do not belong there. Technically correct though it may be, Lycanthropy has been, in a sense, co-opted to mean any form of a…'

New page

Please do not make such notes on Category pages - they do not belong there. Technically correct though it may be, Lycanthropy has been, in a sense, co-opted to mean any form of a "were" disease or disorder. What that means is that your objection has been noted, but will not be acted upon. Thank you. -- [[User:ShadowWolf|ShadowWolf]] 12:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)