User talk:Vitruvian Being: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ShadowWolf (talk | contribs) m Created page with 'Please do not make such notes on Category pages - they do not belong there. Technically correct though it may be, Lycanthropy has been, in a sense, co-opted to mean any form of a…' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please do not make such notes on Category pages - they do not belong there. Technically correct though it may be, Lycanthropy has been, in a sense, co-opted to mean any form of a "were" disease or disorder. What that means is that your objection has been noted, but will not be acted upon. Thank you. -- [[User:ShadowWolf|ShadowWolf]] 12:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC) | Please do not make such notes on Category pages - they do not belong there. Technically correct though it may be, Lycanthropy has been, in a sense, co-opted to mean any form of a "were" disease or disorder. What that means is that your objection has been noted, but will not be acted upon. Thank you. -- [[User:ShadowWolf|ShadowWolf]] 12:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
It's better to receive a response rather than Wikipedia's lifeless bots. | |||
Revision as of 07:42, 21 February 2011
Please do not make such notes on Category pages - they do not belong there. Technically correct though it may be, Lycanthropy has been, in a sense, co-opted to mean any form of a "were" disease or disorder. What that means is that your objection has been noted, but will not be acted upon. Thank you. -- ShadowWolf 12:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
It's better to receive a response rather than Wikipedia's lifeless bots.