We've recently had our first fight with spammers. Basically the spammers lost - because I don't think Shifti is ever without an admin online. Anyway, Shifti is growing by leaps and bounds. We've been online for approximately three months and for a few weeks it looked like we would be an "also ran". Then [[User:Bryan|Bryan]] updated the TSA page on [http://en.wikipedia.org Wikipedia] to mention Shifti and I modified a few pages on [http://furry.wikia.com WikiFur] and we started seeing traffic. Not long after than we were indexed by Google, but still the traffic was light - by the time Shifti had been online for 30 days we'd only hit about three thousand unique visitors. But then [[User:JonBuck|Jon Buck]] decided to move all of his stories to Shifti and replaced his site with a simple page pointing people here. Now, as we near the end of our second full month we've had our best month yet. While not a single one of the above events can be said to have caused this months explosion in traffic, the statistics speak for themselves. With the massive number of visitors (nearly 500) from Google set aside, [[User:JonBuck|Jon Buck's]] redirection is our single biggest source of traffic (short of direct access from bookmarks). Anyway, I guess the point of this little bit of talk is to let everyone know that Shifti is growing up. We've had more than 1300 unique visitors this month - more than we have for the last two months combined. And it holds true for the other stats - including bandwidth use. Before the end of the month Shifti will have used at least a half a gigabyte of bandwidth.
However, there is no need to worry about availability yet. Shifti isn't yet getting the amount of traffic that will cause problems with the server and it's network connection. The traffic is a lot when taken as a whole, but so far Shifti hasn't seen more than thirty megs of traffic in a single day. When Shifti gets to the point that it is pushing the internet connection to fifty percent of available bandwidth, then we'll worry. (However, long before we reach that point donations will start being requested so we can be sure that Shifti will be able to be moved without worries or emergency "donation drives")
::::[[User:ShadowWolf|ShadowWolf]] 22:41, 28 September 2007 (EDT)
=== {{Separator|k|Old News}} ===
Sorry about the down-time everyone. There was a blackout here - seems the local substation blew a main bus-bar in the distribution side. (I heard it go and originally thought it had blown a transformer!) Looks like the worried about "donation" system is going to have to be finalized and brought online sooner - a UPS is desperately needed to help make sure this doesn't happen again.
Sorry about the down-time everyone. There was a blackout here - seems the local substation blew a main bus-bar in the distribution side. (I heard it go and originally thought it had blown a transformer!) Looks like the worried about "donation" system is going to have to be finalized and brought online sooner - a UPS is desperately needed to help make sure this doesn't happen again.
::::[[User:ShadowWolf|ShadowWolf]] 14:14, 23 September 2007 (EDT)
::::[[User:ShadowWolf|ShadowWolf]] 14:14, 23 September 2007 (EDT)
=== {{Separator|k|Old News}} ===
Shifti is growing exponentially. Already this month we've hit almost 200M of bandwidth use and over 500 unique visitors. If this keeps up there may be a problem with the connection serving the site won't be able to keep up. However, there is no need to worry - Shifti is not going to be moving, adding advertising or asking for money to join. Why? Because until it becomes clear that the growth trend is going to continue I see no need to do anything drastic. Even then there is an option that has worked for other sites - donations. So if Shifti keeps up the wild, rampant growth look forward to seeing the Donations page filled out so that a separate server and much higher bandwidth hosting can be paid for to keep the site running.
Shifti is growing exponentially. Already this month we've hit almost 200M of bandwidth use and over 500 unique visitors. If this keeps up there may be a problem with the connection serving the site won't be able to keep up. However, there is no need to worry - Shifti is not going to be moving, adding advertising or asking for money to join. Why? Because until it becomes clear that the growth trend is going to continue I see no need to do anything drastic. Even then there is an option that has worked for other sites - donations. So if Shifti keeps up the wild, rampant growth look forward to seeing the Donations page filled out so that a separate server and much higher bandwidth hosting can be paid for to keep the site running.
::::[[User:ShadowWolf|ShadowWolf]] 18:09, 11 September 2007 (EDT)
::::[[User:ShadowWolf|ShadowWolf]] 18:09, 11 September 2007 (EDT)
Revision as of 21:41, 28 September 2007
We've recently had our first fight with spammers. Basically the spammers lost - because I don't think Shifti is ever without an admin online. Anyway, Shifti is growing by leaps and bounds. We've been online for approximately three months and for a few weeks it looked like we would be an "also ran". Then Bryan updated the TSA page on Wikipedia to mention Shifti and I modified a few pages on WikiFur and we started seeing traffic. Not long after than we were indexed by Google, but still the traffic was light - by the time Shifti had been online for 30 days we'd only hit about three thousand unique visitors. But then Jon Buck decided to move all of his stories to Shifti and replaced his site with a simple page pointing people here. Now, as we near the end of our second full month we've had our best month yet. While not a single one of the above events can be said to have caused this months explosion in traffic, the statistics speak for themselves. With the massive number of visitors (nearly 500) from Google set aside, Jon Buck's redirection is our single biggest source of traffic (short of direct access from bookmarks). Anyway, I guess the point of this little bit of talk is to let everyone know that Shifti is growing up. We've had more than 1300 unique visitors this month - more than we have for the last two months combined. And it holds true for the other stats - including bandwidth use. Before the end of the month Shifti will have used at least a half a gigabyte of bandwidth.
However, there is no need to worry about availability yet. Shifti isn't yet getting the amount of traffic that will cause problems with the server and it's network connection. The traffic is a lot when taken as a whole, but so far Shifti hasn't seen more than thirty megs of traffic in a single day. When Shifti gets to the point that it is pushing the internet connection to fifty percent of available bandwidth, then we'll worry. (However, long before we reach that point donations will start being requested so we can be sure that Shifti will be able to be moved without worries or emergency "donation drives")
Sorry about the down-time everyone. There was a blackout here - seems the local substation blew a main bus-bar in the distribution side. (I heard it go and originally thought it had blown a transformer!) Looks like the worried about "donation" system is going to have to be finalized and brought online sooner - a UPS is desperately needed to help make sure this doesn't happen again.
Shifti is growing exponentially. Already this month we've hit almost 200M of bandwidth use and over 500 unique visitors. If this keeps up there may be a problem with the connection serving the site won't be able to keep up. However, there is no need to worry - Shifti is not going to be moving, adding advertising or asking for money to join. Why? Because until it becomes clear that the growth trend is going to continue I see no need to do anything drastic. Even then there is an option that has worked for other sites - donations. So if Shifti keeps up the wild, rampant growth look forward to seeing the Donations page filled out so that a separate server and much higher bandwidth hosting can be paid for to keep the site running.
Ever looked at the "Blind Pig" universe and decide not to write a story in it because there was some facet that you didn't like? Well, myself, BD, Jon Buck, Cubist and Michael Bard decided to do something about the sometimes annoying holes in the TBP universe. (Most notably is the consistent violation of the Conservation of Mass/Energy and the broken 'neo-luddite' nature of the world that van Sciver didn't have in place but others have later written into the setting)
Anyway, we set to work on modernizing the setting—bringing the science up to date and fixing the holes. The result is the 'Pig and Whistle' universe—a version of the TBP universe stripped of the morass of the history that universe has and corrected to be more realistic. If the setting interests you, there is a 'quick and dirty' intro to the setting called 'Little Things'. And if, after reading that (in my own opinion) horrid hack of a story, you are still intrigued, then write away!
{{title}} has been updated—you can now specify a list of "coauthors" instead of (or in addition to) the 'author' parameter. Though using coauthors means that you'll need to add the links yourself, it also allows for doing things like acknowledging the illustrator and such. And there is a brand-new template you can use—{{byline}}. TheByline Template is meant to be used instead of the Title Template on pages in the main namespace. Enjoy!
Had a power failure that took the server oflfine momentarily while I was asleep. Unfortunately this meant that the rather unstable hack I had to implement to bring my setup inline with what the ISP expects had to be re-established. Of course, I have no idea when the problem happened or how long the server was offline, but from some circumstantial evidence it looks like it was around two hours. The only way that I could correct this would be to coloc the server, and I do not have the money to do that. If there are no complaints I'll be setting up a pay-pal account to accept donations to make the co-location possible and actually happen. Of course this means that Shifti will be entirely donation driven, but I'm sure that the community will help us keep it online. Any comments can be made on my talk page or on this pages talk page.
Lots of interesting stuff has been going on behind the scenes here at Shifti. With the recent explosion of stories (we've passed 100) the administrators have begun adding "Transformation Type" categories. While they aren't mandatory – the category could give away a twist in the story – it is going to be one of the main ways for people to find stories on the site. Another bit of news is that I (ShadowWolf) have added the "ShadowWolf's Pack" as an alternate to Bryan's Picks for finding high quality stories. It has three sections — a rated section, where I will rank the stories from 1 to 4 stars; an unrated section, where I have been putting stories that rate more than four stars and a small section where I'm highlighting the first one or two stories from authors new to Shifti who show great promise.
The template {{part}} has been deprecated and is planned to be removed as soon as the admins get around to removing it from use. The reason is that Bryan discovered a subtle feature of the MediaWiki parser that would generate links into sections of a template if the template used the header markup === text ===. Since {{part}} does this, it was creating a subtle breakage of the sections in articles.
In all seriousness we are trying to make Shifti a great place to find stories. To do this we have been developing the policies regarding categorization as we go along, such that, recently, a change was made to institute Category:Stories by author so that stories are sorted by author and changed the original Category:Author so that it is a place to find a list of authors that have contributed stories, so you can find a list of all stories by a given author.
Old News 
|
Old News 
